Ir al contenido principal

Pair Programming

Pair Programming

It results outstanding to me that the idea of having a pair or a group of programmers working on the same computer is relatively new to the programming world, the phrase of "two heads are better than one" has been existing from a long time ago prior to computation and it is has been proven to work (also it is quite logical), so why pair programming hasn't shine as it's supposed to be?

The only thing that disturbs pair programming is the human factor, humans change their mind but at the same time don't, if they have worked all their lives alone and the results have been good the change to a pair programming will be difficult, they'll think that they are superior than their comrade, the suggestions of the last one will be ignored mostly, no help will be asked, making the pair programming more of a hassle than a good programming method.

Other thing that involves the human factor is the interaction with others, maybe we can get along with someone but that someone is busy and we have to pair with the prick that we hate, nothing good comes from that and I know it from experience, a solid relationship must be made for pair programming to work, not necessary a human relationship but for work there must be, it can be easily accomplished by according that the failure from one will become the failure of both, although this sounds a little menacing and I think is better as a last resort statement, is better to first build a trust and to agree that they must act cooperatively so the work between the pair can be flawless and so that pair programming can shine appropriately.

Pair programming is like the basis for a good work, each one of the duo learns and teaches (without even knowing) even when the pair is the same most of the time, it is a process where everybody wins something, the programmers, the business and the users, each gets a benefit of a good work.

Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

Hey! Listen!!! It's a me Marco

Hello buddies! I´m Marco Antonio Ríos Gutiérrez (the shy guy with freckles) and I have 21 years old. What I mostly like up to this point on my university career is networking and as you may be guessing I plan to work at Cisco Systems, although there's still plenty of courses and thing to learn at school so I hope that on this class I'll find another interest for my further professional development (maybe programming will be again, an option). Actually from this course I expect to regain my strength (if it can be called like that) in programming since, right now, I don't feel confident with my overall level and skills, that't my main goal/expectation for the course. What I most like to do (like most ISC students) is gaming, love The Legend of Zelda and Pokémon since I have memory; recently I received an Xbox One and also began to do some PC gaming with what my little laptop can support :( so I divide my time among those 3 platforms. I really like movie...

Language as the Ultimate Weapon

Language as the Ultimate Weapon Regarding the question about "Why is the Nineteen Eighty-Four novel by George Orwell relevant to a student taking the Programming Language course?" I'm not entirely sure how it can be related but I'll do my best. On programming languages it is fairly common to hear a lot of names, Java, C#, Swift, among others; each person has it favorite and when we found that favorite we begin to have a sort of disgust against the others, we may see the pros of them but we focus more on their cons, we wish that our favorite language were the only one in existence and this may be good or bad, depending on each one. As the reading said, some people is more susceptible to some things than others, one may understand a programming language as if it were born with it but to other it may never get the hang of it but no because is dumb, his mind behaves different thanks to the language he chose. This variety in languages is good in which it allows for...

The Semicolon Wars, opininon

The Semicolon Wars I'm actually a part of the group that thinks that also real life languages have different properties that makes that not everything can be expressed the same way between two languages, that some have an easiness for expressing one idea but trouble for other, and it's not that they were created focusing on expressing something in particular but considering that the needs that people had a long time ago when languages were created are very different from the ones existing now, I think that some languages managed to adapt to a continuously changing world easily than others thanks to how they were built and how their structures work in general. I know that nowadays, to construct a universal language is impossible, in real life languages and in computer languages, the society and world although unified, has it's pillars built from different material (or in this case, languages), all of which vary in so many ways that it was needed to develop some new lang...